Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1223

reference
922-tree-1
name
1223
tree-preservation-order

undefined

922-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.027777 50.869421)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.027721 50.869415,-1.027723 50.869426,-1.027731 50.869436,-1.027743 50.869444,-1.027759 50.869449,-1.027777 50.869451,-1.027794 50.869449,-1.027810 50.869444,-1.027823 50.869437,-1.027831 50.869427,-1.027834 50.869416,-1.027832 50.869404,-1.027824 50.869394,-1.027811 50.869386,-1.027796 50.869381,-1.027778 50.869379,-1.027760 50.869381,-1.027745 50.869386,-1.027732 50.869394,-1.027724 50.869403,-1.027721 50.869415)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL